2008 - Regency Tower under construction in downtown Riverside (RXSQ)

County eyeing under construction office tower

Riverside County is in negotiations to buy the 10-story Regency Tower currently under construction in downtown Riverside. If the sale goes as planned, the privately-developed building will house the District Attorney’s office, which is currently scattered in as many as 10 offices around town.

Though the reported purchase price of $128 million will no doubt save the county money relative to last year’s $216 million proposal for a new DA office building, the cost to Riverside could be significant. The city would lose new high-end office space aimed at attracting more professional clientele downtown. It would also mean lost property taxes for the city as government buildings are typically off the tax rolls.

With or without the purchase by the county, however, the city is likely to see more office buildings constructed as local real estate experts say demand is high for Class A office space downtown:

Dain Fedora, client services manager in the Ontario office of Grubb & Ellis, said it’s not possible to quantify the demand, but the numerous courthouses, restaurants, a large employment base and freeway access all make downtown Riverside highly attractive for law firms and other businesses that need office space.

Riverside Press-Enterprise – September 4, 2008

In fact, developer Moshe Silagi — who is building Regency Tower on spec — says the sale may spur another building of his downtown. This comes on the heels of a recent proposal by another developer for a $40 million, 6-story office building at the southeast corner of University Avenue and Lime Street, on the former Brown’s Engine site adjacent to the 91 Freeway.

Related

  • Riverside Press-Enterprise – DA’s office plan would save Riverside County money, but at what cost to city? (Sept. 4, 2008) | Riverside County in talks to buy unfinished building for DA’s office (Aug. 26, 2008)
  • Riverside Press-Enterprise – Downtown complex proposed (University at Lime) (Aug. 26, 2008)

Previous

Sources: RaincrossSquare.com; Riverside Press-Enterprise (PE-20080826, PE-20080904)

2025 PAGE UPDATE: Removed outdated links to newspaper articles.

Similar Posts

  • Contract dispute halts work on ‘Malfunction Junction’

    After years of waiting for reconstruction of the 60/91/215 freeway interchange in downtown Riverside — AKA “Malfunction Junction” — drivers will have to wait even longer as a recent contract dispute between Caltrans and the primary contractor (Washington-Obayashi) has halted work on the $318 million project. After a year of commitment, the contractor on the…

  • 2008 ‘Festival of Lights’

    2008Festival of Lights 2008Mission Inn In case you missed it, the 16th annual Festival of Lights began this past weekend in downtown Riverside. With 3.5 million lights and hundreds of animated figures, the crown jewel of the nightly festival is the historic Mission Inn hotel. As usual, Friday night’s “lighting ceremony” incorporated extra festivities, including…

  • | |

    Gallery: Riverside — Main Street Pedestrian Mall

    Following the 1956-57 opening of the Riverside Plaza mall, downtown shopping began a slow but steady decline. In response, city leaders quickly began working at remaking the city’s civic center. Discussions took place regarding additional parking, modernized storefronts, and streetscape improvements. In June 1958, Los Angeles architectural firm Welton Beckett & Associates presented a downtown…

  • GO: Farrell’s triumphant return to Riverside!

    After nearly 30 years — and several months of anticipation — Farrell’s Ice Cream Parlour is once again back in Riverside! The relaunched chain held a grand opening this week for its 5th (and largest) restaurant near Riverside’s Castle Park. Those who grew up in Southern California during the 1970s and 1980s will fondly remember…

  • Riverside Restaurant Week

    Riverside Greater DowntownFine Dining Group This week, eight downtown area restaurants are rolling out the red carpet to showcase the city’s growing collection of unique, award-winning dining establishments as part of the first-ever Riverside Restaurant Week. Sponsored by the Riverside Greater Downtown Fine Dining Group, patrons will be able to experience upscale culinary delights and…

4 Comments

  1. I was kind of worried about this too, but after I thought about it for a bit, I came to the conclusion that they weigh almost the same. Although I’m starting to think that the county purchase might have the edge…

    If the County buys it….

    – The county saves money
    – Lower county taxes
    – Silagi will most likley invest into another project sooner as a replacement projcet to bring Class A office space to Downtown
    – If Mark Rubin’s project gets approved soon, Class A office space still won’t be too far off.

    If it stays in the hands of Silagi…

    – Businesses/Groups will have excellent Class A ofice space now.
    – Riverside will be getting more tax revenue sooner during this hurting economy
    – The county will still need the new DA building and will probably build one of similar size to Regency tower

    I almost see it simplified to an issue of whether or not Riverside will get new Class A office space now, or later.

    I don’t think Rubin’s choice for his project is affected by either decision, although the timing of his project will benefit businesses in search of space if Regency Tower is sold to the county. Silagi may be thinking of building another project regardless of his decision to sell Regency Tower, but I believe the chances of him doing so will be higher and sooner if he sells the building to the county. Plus, as nice as Regency Tower is looking to be, I wouldn’t mind Silagi heading another project, especially if it is at this same caliber. 🙂

  2. (Pub: Sep. 15 2008)
    Jason, a nice assessment of the possibilities. We too think there’s a good chance that if the County buys the building, it will likely spur other Class A office projects. Thus, in the long run, it likely would be a win-win situation for both the City and County (not too mention the taxpayers).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.